Fits the current discussion “nature”. As Uwe rightly says in his post, nature is no longer what it used to be. Urban habitats are being conquered more and more by wild animals because in the “natural” or “near-natural” areas the living conditions have become too bad I do not see why a blue tit on the branch of a planted tree should be more “nature photography” As a dove on a roof For me, one thing counts: The wild animal must have adopted the pictured habitat for itself – whether in the city center, the artificial park or, if we still really find it, a natural habitat. I do not even worry about this picture, whether the pigeons were originally located with us. Now they are there, wild and free, point.